CHAPTER 3: STRATEGIC
LEADERSHIP
In chapter
three, Schrum and Levin discuss the integration of technology. One of the key
things touched upon in this chapter is how to understand the ways individuals
deal with change and innovation. Another topic that was discussed was the role
technology leaders in the school play in getting people involved and helping
with the integration as well as assessing the technology rich lessons that
should arise from new implementations.
We know that
everyone approaches change differently; there is no better evidence of that
than in a public school building. As new technology and innovations are
adopted, educators implement these in different ways—some embrace and run with
it, while others sit back and don’t want to have anything to do with the
changes. The authors present two different frameworks of how people accept
change. One of these frameworks is from Rogers (2003). Rogers characterizes
people according to their willingness to adopt and use new technology based
upon how much they are interested in it and how much value they place upon it.
Rogers categorized people with those being most accepting to least accepting of
change as “Innovators” (those who start the innovation), “Early adopters”
(those who try innovation carefully), “Early majority” (thoughtful and careful
but still willing to change), “Late majority” (skeptics who wait until the
majority tries something new) and “Laggards” (critical of new
ideas/innovations). The other framework for how people change was the
Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) and its stages of concern created by Hall
and Hord (1987). In this model, there are basically steps that persons work
through as they build a context for thinking about change: Awareness (learning
about the change), Information (getting more information about the change),
Personal, Management (determining how I will use the change), Consequence
(determining if this works for me), Collaboration (figuring out how others use
this innovation), and Refocusing (what else can be done to make this better).
Finally, the
authors discuss how important it is for those being asked to use technology to
feel comfortable with it. They propose that it is crucial for professional
development related to technology resources to be prevalent so that people will
understand it, realize its potential, and make use of it. They also point out
that those who feel more comfortable with technology are often needed to take a
leadership role in their environments in order to help with planning and
implementation of innovative technology.
I found the two
models for how people accept change to be very interesting. As I sat and read
this chapter, I could picture people in my mind that fit Rogers’ categories—it
was pretty funny! I think one of the most important things that was discussed
in this chapter was that you have to make people feel comfortable with
something new before you can expect a great response to it. It is difficult for
most people to jump in and start using a new technology with students before
they feel comfortable with it themselves. It goes back to what we discussed in
some of the previous chapters, teachers are having to adopt new roles,
sometimes they are learning from their students. However, I think that they
will feel more comfortable with this role change (or partnering) if they are
provided a more comfortable foundation of technology understanding as well as
the comfort of a “go-to” person when they have technology implementation
questions or problems.
Do you see this a lot when you first introduce students to the equipment they will use in the field? Some of the students immediately embrace all the way down to maybe older students who are nervous about using the machinery even though they have been learning about it? It's a little different then discussing teachers in schools who are having to adjust their teaching styles, it has to deal with the students reception to what they will use their entire life.
ReplyDeleteGood question! I actually don't see it as much with students because they are pretty much forced to use different machines everywhere they go--if they don't adapt, they could potentially fail--at least the clinical aspect of their program. Where I have witnessed this the most is actually out in the clinic--where the experienced sonographers are. They get used to the machine that they use everyday and if you bring a new one in, you have those who will jump in and learn everything about it in a day and are excited about it and teach others about it and then you have others who will stick with an older, usually less efficient model just because it is easy and they don't want to learn anything new. It's always fun to observe people in the face of change! It can be a real learning experience when you have to turn that magnifying glass on yourself too!
Delete