Thursday, February 7, 2013


CHAPTER 11: TOP TEN RULES THAT GOVERN SCHOOL AUTHORITY OVER STUDENT CYBER EXPRESSIONS

Chapter eleven presents ten rules that cover a range of issues when dealing with student expression by way of technological means. With these ten rules, the authors discuss important topics such as First Amendment applications, censorship permissibility, inappropriateness, regulations of time, place and manner of expressions, and threats and criminal activity. Basically the authors touch on areas where questions might arise about what is allowable and what isn’t when student expression is presented by way of technological means.

This chapter was interesting. I found it encouraging that schools do have the ability to intervene and censor material. Even though I feel that First Amendment rights are so very important, I believe it is also very important to make students aware that those rights are not just inclusive of what they want to say but that those rights pertain to what someone else wants (or more likely) doesn’t want to be exposed to. I found Rule 8 to be a bit concerning. It basically states that off-campus expressions can not be regulated by schools unless it disrupts school-related activities. Maybe I am misunderstanding something, but this, I think is where true cyber-bullying occurs. It is in the “My-Space” and “Facebook” pages, that are not school sanctioned, where this bullying takes place. I guess, maybe I am misreading this, because in one chapter we talk about how to keep this from happening, but then in this chapter it feels like basically we are being told that school’s can’t do anything about it.?????

2 comments:

  1. If it happens in school, I believe the school can do something about it. If it happens outside of school, just like any form of bullying outside of school, someone else has to handle it.

    Cyberbullying, like real bullying, causes harm, impedes freedom and, when severe, is illegal. Authorities can get involved both and outside of schools.

    I think that section exists to tell school when it is no longer their jurisdiction rather than saying that they cannot contact authoirities about threats affecting their students. At least that was my understanding/logic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good way to think about it, Russ. I think it would be interesting to see how much cyber task forces have grown over the last few years. I would find it interesting to see how they track the information needed to stop bullying.

      Delete